eHealth Adoption eHealth Adoption Create a PowerPoint presentation that reviews four peer-reviewed articles written in the last five years on the issue

Click here to Order a Custom answer to this Question from our writers. It’s fast and plagiarism-free.

eHealth Adoption  

 Create a PowerPoint presentation that reviews four peer-reviewed articles written in the last five years on the issues around the adoption of eHealth in the Kingdom. Your presentation should contain the following concepts. Discuss at least 4 of the following perceptions that physicians may have that could be causing them to hesitate in using this technology. 

Usefulness

Technical support available

Increased workload

User-friendly technology

Staff attitudes

Cost

Patient privacy

 

requirements:

Be 10 slides in length, not including the title or reference slides.

Be formatted according to  APA writing guidelines. 

Provide citations from six scholarly articles. 

These citations should be listed in the Notes section of the slide in which they appear. 

Each slide must provide detailed speaker’s notes to support the slide content. These should be a minimum of 100 words long (per slide) and must be a part of the presentation. 

 Notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials. 

Utilize the following headings to organize the content in your presentation:

Introduction

4 of the above topics as 4 slides

Cultural, Social, or Religious Barriers

Recommendations for KSA

Conclusion

SEU HCM570
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 6

Exceeds Expectation Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points
Requirements Exceeds Expectation

-Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.

Meets Expectation
– Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.

Below Expectation
– Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.

Limited Evidence –
Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.

21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points
Content Exceeds Expectation

– Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive knowledge
of the materials,
with no errors or
major omissions.

Meets Expectation
– Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may
include some
minor errors or
omissions.

Below Expectation
– Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some
major errors or
omissions.

Limited Evidence –
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major errors or
omissions.

25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points
Analysis Exceeds Expectation

– Provides strong
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts
and applications.

Meets Expectation
– Provides
adequate thought,
insight, and
analysis of
concepts and
applications.

Below Expectation
– Provides poor
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.

Limited Evidence –
Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.

13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points
Sources Exceeds Expectation

– Sources go above
and beyond
required criteria,
and are well chosen
to provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.

Meets Expectation
– Sources meet
required criteria
and are adequately
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.

Below Expectation
– Sources meet
required criteria,
but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.

Limited Evidence –
Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.

Mechanics and Writing
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 1-4 Points
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.

Exceeds Expectation
– Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and

Meets Expectation
– Project is fairly
well organized and
written, and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.

Below Expectation
– Project is poorly
organized and
written, and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.

Limited Evidence –
Project is not
organized or well
written, and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;

SEU HCM570
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 6

paragraph structure;
contains no errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.

Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure; may
include a few
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.

Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style,
or APA citations
and references.

unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
and APA citations
and references.

Total points possible = 105

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by one of our experts, guaranteeing you an A result.

Need an Essay Written?

This sample is available to anyone. If you want a unique paper order it from one of our professional writers.

Get help with your academic paper right away

Quality & Timely Delivery

Free Editing & Plagiarism Check

Security, Privacy & Confidentiality