Reply to each of the attached posts. Response must be at least 100 words each. Responses must be substantive written responses.
What is Substantive Interaction? · The School of Business is committed to the collaborative learning model. In this course, collaborative learning requires each student to read and spend time reflecting on other’s postings, and then respond in a substantive manner to the postings of others. In composing substantive responses, you can do several things, such as: *compare/contrast the findings of others with your research; *compare how the findings of others relate and add to the concepts learned in the required readings; and/or *share additional empirical knowledge regarding global business — or international experiences you may have had — relative to the postings of others. · The collaborative learning model requires substantive interaction between students on a weekly basis. Consider the Discussion as equivalent to being in a class, thus maintain professional communication standards at all times (no “IM” shorthand or informal jargon, please).
APA format. Credible scholarly sources/references to support.
FOLLOW GRADING RUBRIC ATTACHED
Criteria Ratings Points
Thread 40 to >35.0 pts
Advanced
All key components of the
Discussion prompt are
answered in the thread, exactly
as listed in the instructions.
The thread has a clear, logical
flow. Major points are stated
clearly. Major points are
supported by good examples
or thoughtful analysis.
35 to >28.0 pts
Proficient
Most of the components of the
Discussion prompt are
answered in the thread,
exactly as listed in the
instructions. The thread has a
logical flow. Major points are
stated reasonably well. Major
points are supported by good
examples or thoughtful
analysis.
28 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The Discussion
prompt is addressed
minimally. The
thread lacks flow or
content, and does
not follow the exact
assignment
instructions. Major
points are unclear
or confusing. Major
points are not
supported by
examples or
thoughtful analysis.
0 pts
Not
Present
40 pts
Replies 30 to >26.0 pts
Advanced
Each reply focuses on a
meaningful point made in
another student’s thread. Each
reply provides substantive
additional thoughts regarding
the thread and an explanation
of why the student agrees or
disagrees with the idea
presented in the thread. Each
reply is clear and coherent. A
minimum of 3 substantive
replies are submitted. See
instructions for what
constitutes a substantive reply.
26 to >21.0 pts
Proficient
Most replies focus on a
meaningful point made in
another student’s thread. Most
replies provide substantive
additional thoughts regarding
the thread and an explanation
of why the student likes or
dislikes the idea presented in
the thread. Most replies are
clear and coherent. A
minimum of 2 substantive
replies are submitted. See
instructions for what
constitutes a substantive reply.
21 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Some replies focus
on a point made in
another student’s
thread. Replies
could be more
substantive
regarding the
thread. Replies lack
clarity and
coherence. A
minimum of 1
substantive reply is
submitted. See
instructions for what
constitutes a
substantive reply.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Discussion Grading Rubric | BUSI604_B05_202220
Criteria Ratings Points
Spelling,
Grammar,
Current
APA
Formatting
30 to >26.0 pts
Advanced
Spelling and grammar are
correct. Sentences are
complete, clear, and concise.
Paragraphs contain
appropriately varied sentence
structures. Exact level heading
required wording is present. 5
references are cited in current
APA format.
26 to >21.0 pts
Proficient
Some spelling and grammar
errors are present. Sentences
are presented well.
Paragraphs contain some
varied sentence structures.
Inexact level heading required
wording is present Where
applicable, 4 references are
cited with APA formatting.
21 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Spelling and
grammar errors
distract. Sentences
are incomplete or
unclear. Paragraphs
are poorly formed.
Level heading
required wording is
present references
are minimally or not
cited in current APA
format.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Total Points: 100
Discussion Grading Rubric | BUSI604_B05_202220
