Collective Bargaining Read Attached Collective Bargaining from Reeves (2006). Cases in Public Human Resource Management. Cengage. Submission Instructions:

Click here to Order a Custom answer to this Question from our writers. It’s fast and plagiarism-free.

Collective Bargaining Read Attached Collective Bargaining from Reeves (2006). Cases in Public Human Resource Management. Cengage.
Submission Instructions:

Answer the following questions:

1) In this negotiation, it seems like it will be impossible for the two sides to be able to meet an agreement – as to do so will likely lead to one side loosing. This situation is not uncommon in Union-Management Negotiations. What should the negotiators do in order to to prepare for the negotiation and make sure that it is successful (defined as 
2) Provide at least 2 alternative plans (from what the two parties in the case want). You are to provide recommendations that create a compromise or collaboration where everyone being represented will be satisfied.
3) Both parties’ negotiators were given specific instructions and goals that they were to achieve; however, it is not realistic to expect either party to be able to achieve these orders. What consequences would you as the mayor for the city representative and as a union member to the union representatives have for your negotiators if they fail to follow orders. Hint: Think about concepts from your other classes.
4) Why is it illegal for the fire fighters to strike? What could they do instead to protest during the negotiations?
5) If an impasse is reached, what rights does the company have? How might the union try to thwart the impasse in this situation?

Follow current APA format for citations and reference page if used.
A paragraph for each question.
Complete and submit the assignment by 9:00 PM ET Sunday through Canvas.

Attached is the case and power points of this topic in certain chapters. MAN 712 Final Exam

Collective Bargaining


Taking the Firefighters’ Heat

Great negotiators are not “naturals” who simply possess some hidden talent

unknown to others. Effective negotiation requires shill building that can only be

perfected through knowledge and repetitive practice on a regular basis in each

negotiating situation. Positional bargaining is a strategy that is based on moving

from position to position, without one’s true agenda, until compromise is

reached. Unlike problem-solving negotiation, which has been called “getting to

yes,” positional bargaining is more like “getting to OK.”

The City of Concord, New Hampshire, has a population of 50,000 inhabitant, and its city hall is

currently preparing for negotiations with the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF),

Local #37, which represents the 120 full-time firefighters and paramedics who are deployed

among seven station houses. Both parties are approaching the upcoming negotiations with

some trepidation because labor-management relations under the present collective bargaining

agreement have been anything but harmonious.


The city’s negotiating team consists of three members; the personnel director, budget director,

and the chief of the fire department. Both of the former individuals are classified employees

whereas the chief is a political appointee and long-time friend of the mayor.

Currently, Concord Fire Department (CFD) employees in the bargaining unit earn an average of

$30,000 per year in wages, plus a generous benefit package calculated as worth another

$20,000 per employee. Thus, the compensation package fir CFD employees totals some $6

million for represented employees, approximately $700,000 for six managers (the chief and five

assistant chiefs), and almost $250,000 for two secretaries and five dispatchers.

Traditionally, overtime costs have run approximately $7.2 million annually. Management has

been advised by an outside consultant to consider flexing work schedules so that it can avoid

paying excessive overtime, but this proposal would certainly be strongly opposed by the union.

Negotiations also are expected to center on issues of pay, health insurance, and annual leave

time, with management needing to hold costs as much as possible.

Management’s position is exacerbated by the fact that neighboring Manchester, a city of

approximately 100,000 citizens, pays its firefighters and paramedics an average of $2,000 per

year more than Concord, provides comparable benefits, and allows a week more annual leave

(three to five weeks, depending on seniority, in contrast to the two to four weeks given by

CFD). Increased annual leave would mean hiring more employees, and the mayor is adamantly

MAN 712 Final Exam

opposed to new hires. The negotiating team believes that the union will want a package similar

to the Manchester Fire Department, but the mayor has ordered the management team to hold

the line on labor costs.

Budget projections for next year are pessimistic, and layoffs will need to be implemented if

labor costs go up. The city’s negotiating team has been instructed that it may spend no more

than $7.5 million per year for the next two years and may only negotiate a two-year contract.

The rising cost of health care means that positions must be eliminated, or compensation

decreased, if the city is to remain within budget projections. The management team has been

authorized to threaten the union, if necessary, with layoffs and even with closure of one of the

fire stations. As far as health care is concerned, the mayor is not opposed to increasing

copayments (currently, workers pay nothing except for $5 per prescription and $5 per office

visit), employee contribution to health care premiums (currently, workers pay nothing and all

family members are included), or a preferred provider program (currently employees have a

choice of physicians and hospitals).

The current Collective Bargaining Agreement provides a 3 percent per year in wages, two weeks

annual leave for employees with one to five years in service, three weeks for employees with

six to ten years, and four weeks for employees with more than ten years in service.. The union

has indicated that it will seek a 6 percent wage increase for the first year of the upcoming

contract, and 4 percent for each year thereafter included in the agreement. The union would

like a long-term contract of three or four years, and it would also like to hold steady on health

care benefits as well as more annual leave.


The union’s negotiating team consists of three negotiators; a professional negotiator from the

IAFF international headquarters, the local’s president, and the secretary-treasurer of Local

#123. There is some smoldering resentment among rank-and-file members who feel that they

put their lives on the line for an average of $30,000 in wages, while the five assistant chiefs

have hefty salaries averaging $80,000, and the chief makes in excess of $100,000 annually.

Most of the assistant chiefs and the chief were formerly active in the union before crossing over

to the management side.

As indicated, current negotiations are centered on pay, health insurance, and annual leave, but

the most irritating fact is that Concord firefighters and paramedics are treated so much worse

that Manchester employees with similar jobs. Concord employees believe that they are just as

good as their Manchester counterparts and deserve comparable pay and benefits. A 6 percent

raise during the first year of the next contract would close the gap between CFD and MFD, and

4 percent for each year thereafter would enable workers to hold steady in comparison with

Manchester. The unit membership has insisted that the negotiating team hold steady on health

care benefits, and they would like annual leave comparable to MFD.

MAN 712 Final Exam

The union’s negotiating team has heard the city’s usual lament regarding fiscal stress and the

need for restraint; it has also been subjected to the usual threat of layoffs. However, the union

feels that all of these excuses mask an indifference to the dedication and professionalism of

CFD’s employees. Even though Manchester is a larger city than Concord, it has a lower median

income level. The union team is convinced that its first task will be to convince the city to take

the issue of parity with Manchester seriously by negotiating in good faith. Concord firefighters

have authorized a strike in an unofficial vote, even though it is illegal under state law, if parity

with Manchester is not achieved through collective bargaining.

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by one of our experts, guaranteeing you an A result.

Need an Essay Written?

This sample is available to anyone. If you want a unique paper order it from one of our professional writers.

Get help with your academic paper right away

Quality & Timely Delivery

Free Editing & Plagiarism Check

Security, Privacy & Confidentiality